Check the label – your brand could contain Maltodextrin which rates high on the glycemic index= insulin resistance.
One small bowl of rice has 15 tea spoons of sugar!
Better to buy pure liquid Stevia.
Check the label – your brand could contain Maltodextrin which rates high on the glycemic index= insulin resistance.
One small bowl of rice has 15 tea spoons of sugar!
Better to buy pure liquid Stevia.
Guys, make sure you’re not consuming too much sugar. Make sure you know where to find hidden sources of sugar.
This week My oldest slave will turn 50 years old. He’s starting to retain belly fat. He eats lots of fruit (to your body, sugar from fruit is no different than sugar from a candy bar).
If you don’t want to gain fat, eat less sugar, keep foods low on the glycemic index.
“About 5 gallons of water are wasted every time teeth are brushed with the water running. If teeth are brushed twice per day, 3,650 gallons are wasted per year per person.”
We spoke awhile back and I was a member of your site for a while. Have been into Female Supremacy for a long time and am in agreement with your very articulate opinions.
For highly complex reasons, humiliation is a sexual turn on for me. Am struggling with whether it is possible to be submissive and at the same time not be a “loser”. Are the men you are having eat out of dog dishes and engaging in masturbation contests losers?
Obviously, I can’t speak for all dominant Females, but I will say this is a very common idea produced from very common thinking.
I just recently had to address this misconception with an admirer who assumed those who serve Me are weak and pathetic. Slavery—true slavery, true sacrifice, by will alone—isn’t sought by the weak.
Those men who seek to serve are courageous and passionate men who place themselves under My heel to be crushed and molded. They give themselves up, along with their male ego, to be humiliated, debased, used and exploited.
Let’s see your average garden variety tough guy on the football team suffer a day of that for a Woman. This isn’t to say My slaves aren’t pathetic, groveling, weak and hopelessly obedient, loving puppets for Me (they definitely are!), but that is a far cry from being a capital L “loser” in general.
Why would I want a worthless and useless person who has nothing to offer? What is there to be gained from that?
I want useful, passionate worshipers who believe in what I believe, not useless scum from the bottom of the barrel.
So, yeah, this is happening. https://www.businessinsider.com/black-hole-in-our-galaxy-suddenly-eating-everything-in-way-2019-9
Don’t pet stray cats/dogs.
What is it about the sexually liberated Woman that entices, yet scares people so much?
Obviously, the power of sex is strong—perhaps the strongest force in humans, and in so being, one of the strongest forces on Earth.
Since the dawn of Eve, the vivacious and sensually powerful Woman has been sought through the compulsions of natural desires.
And yet, one who has any understanding of the human mind and the way it has long operated, will concede to the reality that humans are also at war and conflict with this power.
In today’s “woke” age, it is pathetic that Women’s sexuality is still demonized, oppressed, defined, and stigmatized.
But what a breath of fresh air: Erika Jayne breaks through this uptight conservatism and prudishness of malignant patriarchal obsessive control, an obsession that seeks to limit and mute the power and influence of the Female sex.
She owns Her sensuality and make no apologies about it!
The interesting origin of a “furry” fetish.
Another lively conversation with Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss.
“A truly open mind means forcing our imaginations to conform to the evidence of reality, and not vice versa,
whether or not we like the implications.”
Dear Ms. Saharaheve:
I’m a new, late 30’s male with limited r/l experience. I have lots of experience with pro doms and a brief relationship going back a while ago with a lady who liked to dominate me. Unfortunately she didn’t do a lot of the things pro doms did to me and I assumed she wasn’t a real dom. I’m kinda at fault because I was under many assumptions such as,
1. thinking all doms were ready to play with anyone 24/7
2. thinking Mistresses always walked around with all their war make-up on, hair all done up, fetish clothes on and in high heels 24/7
Yeah, pretty naive.
I started off thinking all I had to do was tell her my kinks and fetishes then poof she’d be interested in them. It didn’t last and off I went to join BDSM dating sites.
So many guys are hardwired to their sex drives and I’m wondering if you see a lot of men who think doms are wired to just hook up with anyone just because they like the same thing?
I’m older now and the sexual component is not as important to me as finding out what pleases her and making it happen.
No, Mistresses are not always dressed up in heels, make-up and sexy clothes 24/7.
And neither do we walk around hoping to tempt all males into total submission. LOL.
On a more serious note, I am glad you wrote. I have decided it is time to make a post about My personal opinions regarding online fantasy vs. real-life reality of Mistress and slave.
For Me, writing this entry is a matter of intellectual conscience, for as I speak with many newbie males I have increasingly realized that something needs to be addressed about how “Mistresses” and “slaves” really interact in the real world.
To cut to the chase, there is a vast curtain of adult commercial glitz in the industry that is Femdom, and unless an impressionable man knows otherwise, he can easily get caught up in the gilded illusions of fetish porn and the fantastical imagery.
Imagery, mind you, that is beautifully and sensually designed to arouse—but says really nothing of the context of a relationship between a Woman and Her slave.
In the enormous continuum of media churned out by adult-porn studios, we get to see a lot of sexy and erotic content, for sure.
Oral sex, face sitting, anal penetration with strap-ons, or outright intercourse are things that seem as foregone conclusions with all this sexy “Mistress and slave” stuff.
What many may fail to realize is that nearly 100% of the men featured in these images and films are paid adult actors and models and most of the Women featured in these images and films are paid adult actresses.
Not that there is anything wrong with good marketing, but we would never, for an instant, be so gullible as to assume the worlds presented to us in glossy magazine ads, commercials and movies are real, so why would we attribute reality to any of the media we see regularly presented by commercial studios and professional services online?
The simple point is we should not, for if we do we are liable to be a bit confused when the candy coated porn version hits the concrete of the real world and bloodies its nose.
In reality, you may never, as a slave, have access to your Mistress as shown in all these movies.
So, to avoid mincing words or droning on without getting to the point, let Me simply say the following: Being servile does not allow a male instant access to a Woman’s sex, Her dominance or even Her affection.
Unlike professional Dominatrices, a dominant Woman—much less a Mistress—is not obligated to serve your fetishes, your kinks, or your desires for romantic intimacy.
The obligation and responsibility goes from man to Woman and slave to Mistress.
That is really the entire point of Mistress and slave. Indeed, She may enjoy using him sexually and to Her satisfaction, but it is not a given that She will or must, and many of the would-be slaves out there really need to consider this deeply before jumping into the pool with too many assumptions.
And the assumptions are pretty easy to have by way of imagery shown before our eyes whenever we look up the words Femdom or Mistress and slave on the Internet or read about them in fantasy novels.
A Mistress is a Woman, a human being first and foremost. Her desire to dominate you, if it is authentic, is triggered by you, i.e., you are that inspiring incentive.
She does not walk around with a deep seated passion to dominate any and all males.
She is a human being, and like all human beings, context often informs Her interests in the sexual act. She must be attracted to a man first before wanting—truly wanting—to dominate him and engage in the deeper shades of sexual exchange with him.
And when I say “attracted” I am not only speaking of the physical, but of the psychological, and, truth be told, the latter is more where it is at.
A beautiful man can still be a blunt and ungainly ignoramus with no class or depth and without the right attitude he is not going to be very attractive to an alpha Female.
If a man wants to have that special privilege of serving his Goddess so intimately he needs to have the right stuff and that stuff can not be faked transiently.
Outside of being an attractive and honorable man in general, he needs to prove himself through blood, sweat, and tears that he is there for Her and that he cares deeply for Her comfort and gain.
Always loyal and eager to please Her, always there for Her and extending himself for Her, he will impart a sense of security and thus comfort Her immensely.
But even this is not enough, necessarily, for a slave is expected to provide these things with or without sexual intimacy anyway.
He can have many good qualities and still remain kept from tasting Her intimately. This should not be something that makes him quit at all.
It should inspire him toward his servitude all the more. Indeed, slave labor sublimates sexual tension and drive but the slave himself may not ever be allowed access to Her at all…and this will only serve to tease and deliciously compel his slavery.
Ideally he should come to see Her as an untouchable embodiment of the Feminine Divine, an entity he should feel lucky enough to simply be in the presence of alone, and should he be granted the privilege of kissing Her feet, it will be awe-inspiring and satiating alone.
But sex and sexual acts? These are never a given, as much as all the gobs of Internet movies like to lead one to think otherwise.
As stated above, for as much as a man may have good qualities and perfect loyalty, that is not a guarantee he will be wanted intimately.
All slaves must come before their potential Mistresses knowing this potential reality.
If he does appeal to Her and he remains a devoted and all-consumed heel-licking slave for Her every whim, he may very well have the lofty pleasure and honor of pleasing Her.
But never should the sexual act or Her sexual interest be taken for granted as the world of fetish porn seems so given to do.
With all due respect, for you to place most dommes in the category of women who just please male fetishes and leave yourself out is a little much. Yes you may “enjoy” treating men like puppies and dogs, pissing on them, sitting on their faces, shocking them and everything else you “like” do, but these are all things that were initially imagined by the male mind. Just like almost all dominatrices who claim they are so real, so “lifestyle”, so not doing what the men tell them too when in actuality they are. Femdom completely is male fantasy. It’s like a video a game. Yes you the player can walk wherever you like in the game, change your outfits within the game, and do different special combinations, but at the end of the day the name of the game and software was developed by perverted feminine degrading patriarchal culture, and the goal of that game is to either make them cum in some weird way, or put off their orgasm. Just like most dommes you just separate yourself from the “others” because you are successful at being spoiled. It’s just like courtesans who say they aren’t prostitutes cause they aren’t walking the streets. Just because you deal with a male of “higher” caliber doesn’t make you not what you are, an objectified automated female robot toy programmed to dominate and doesn’t realize it. Just like I know you will like to think that your fake boobs, fake nails, fake hair are all just a natural expression of your femininity and has nothing to do with pleasing men. We both know that isn’t true. We know women didn’t invent these things, didn’t need those things, and those things were developed to make woman in man’s ideal plastic image. That’s who you are despite how smart or how well put together you are.
Again I’m not saying this to be disrespectful, but I get tired of hearing certain females make it seem like they built the house they live in. You are a male sexual object. All your interests in subjugating males were introduced to you by males and their cocks. You just made their interests your own because you sleep in a bed that they purchased, and travel and live at their expense. Which nothing is really wrong with that. But I challenge you to “enslave” these boys without treating them like animals, without hurting or “degrading” them. Or can you? I would like to see you express your dominance outside of the male imagination, without “using their desires against them”. Only then will you be doing what you for you and not to upkeep a fantasy world for lowly perverted males. Otherwise you will only be dealing in the realm of pleasing them, directly or indirectly. I would also bring it to your attention that matriarchal means mother-centered, which doesn’t mean female-centered. A matriarchy is a culture, a community, an economy, that includes women, their families, and their environment, not a male constructed fantasy. To bring up the word matriarchy means to invoke ancient cultures where mothers dominated not through degradation or pissing on people but because of their true feminine powers of giving and sustaining life, human and non-human. I would like to see “matriarchal” dommes think in those terms.
It may surprise you to hear me say that it is you, actually, who is the instrument of “the patriarchy”, as much as you may not think you are.
Scratching your head? Please allow me to explain.
In general, your leeriness of male influence and meddling in the world has a definite thread of wisdom, but they way I see it, taking it to this paranoid extreme serves as nothing more than the ultimate way to strip Women of their sexual power, influence and dominance.
In your world view, Women are destined to be sex objects no matter what, apparently. How very convenient that:
a. being a sex object is unavoidable, and
b. you have consigned yourself to the shell game—purposefully or inadvertently—that being a sex object is inherently bad in this day and age.
I was surprised to learn after reading your words that everything I think and every action I take in my dominance with my males (or appreciation for my own Feminine aesthetic as well, it seems) is somehow a contrivance of males and male thinking and male influence and male directives.
To that I say, with all due respect in return, nonsense.
I do understand the ways the sexes influence one another.
Women, just like men, do not and most likely will not ever live in a vacuum from each other.
We influence and are influenced by the opposite sex in ways big and small; this is inevitable and ultimately apparent to a mature, rational thinker who isn’t afraid of getting cooties or being in the presence of an unabashed erection.
With that being said, your insistence that I’m just another cloned fetish robot that never had an original thought in her head when it came to dominating men is not only ludicrous (given that you don’t know me and have never been privy to my formative thoughts) but also (and rather ironically, I might add) underscores how original I really am, in the end—if we buy into your idea that all Women are various permutations of Stepford
Wives obeying the supreme male directive. Fortunately, that’s just not true.
Females have fully functioning brains, and can have brazen thoughts of their own. What a novel idea!
You see, when I was in elementary school, my friends and I enjoyed picking on the boys we liked.
We would tease them, taunt them, manipulate them, and sometimes downright torture them, and not out of hostility either, but a desire to “have fun”.
I can personally remember accounts of us Girls holding boys down and slow-drolling our spit right into their mouths, or outrunning and tackling young males on the recess field for the sheer thrill of it.
They grew to love the attention and would tease us back to try and get our attention all over again. I enjoyed having boys carry my books for me or fetch things out of my locker for me later on in junior high.
I called them my “go get it” boys. During these times I was wholeheartedly enjoying the influence and power I had over the males of my age, and this is long before I came to put words to the things I did.
This was also all without the aid of the internet and BDSM porn so ever-present with the click of a mouse today.
I suppose the patriarchy was influencing me in some other way, even then?
Perhaps it was in the school’s Kool Aid or peanut butter bars? Mmmm, peanut butter bars! Remember those?
Anyway, regarding your assertions of objectifying myself for men in everything I do, I’d would say you do have a very narrow and once again limited view on who I am and how I live my life.
Has it ever dawned upon you that we Women sometimes enjoy getting our nails done and hair dolled up all of Our own accord?
We no doubt use our make-up and hair styles and long nails and heels to attract and seduce men, but men do the same for us.
Let us pick apart more of your unfortunate (and rather gross) truisms.
You claim that “Femdom” was invented by males.
While some cliché iterations of “Femdom” may be orchestrated solely by the aggregate demand of nutsacks, “Femdom” and Female dominance are not perfectly synonymous anyway, at least not in my book.
There is without a doubt a “product” version of Female dominance in circulation; it is so rapaciously consumed by the types who frequent “dungeons” and pick from a menu what sensation play they require to come out an hour later grinning ear-to-ear.
I don’t want you to think I look down upon these types, or the very talented actresses who often play the parts these men need, but to lump all dominant Females into the same group of “Femdom is a male fantasy” is block headed, utterly ignorant, and smacks of little to no balanced, real-world experience at all;
you are blind (or quite determined not to see) the different forms of Female dominance there are in the world, not to mention the fact that simply because a “pro” serves in one capacity doesn’t mean She isn’t being served in another—or is everything so absolute and bi-level to you?
Further, to say Female dominance is wholly and completely a product and invention of the male not only goes against the living example that I know I am,
but also requires a fairly lengthy and esteemed peer-reviewed research paper indicating just exactly how this is so.
Somehow I doubt this paper and the exhaustive historic research that accompanies it is actually forthcoming.
Your stance, in one blunt and ignorant motion, denies the origin of dominance having a possibility in the Female sex, and your insistence that it’s all a “video game” that Women are trapped in is cynical, pessimistic,
defeatist, and finally, pro-male propaganda disguising itself as a “reality check”, which does little more than perpetuate the power of its idea, ironically.
We live in a world with a human population of 6.6 billion, roughly half of which is Female, according to sites like Geohive.
Are you saying that out of the 3,386,509,865 Females (calculated in 2008) in the world, not a single one ever conceives on Her own the idea of controlling the man in Her life or dominating him?
Of using Her Female intellect and charms to control him?
Ordering his dinner for him? Deciding on a movie to see for the evening? Insisting on almost always driving? Administering chores in the household? Managing his money?
Insisting on gentlemanly etiquette? Initiating sex and intimacy? Of belting him? Slapping him? Caging him? Sitting on his face? Urinating on him?
Having Her way with him in general?
Honestly, it takes more faith to believe in that than it does to believe the second coming of Christ is soon at hand.
Your insinuations that I do not really like doing what I do are equally untenable, considering I am the only one who can speak with authority on who I am and what I like.
Who invented what—even if it could be proven or even if such a dichotomy made sense to bring up—is wholly and completely irrelevant. I’m quite free to (and do) engage in whatever activities amuse or interest or benefit me, regardless of who first invented this or that.
I have no trouble writing this to you on a computer and operating software that was no doubt conceived, designed and engineered mostly by carriers of the Xy chromosome. Though, Ada Lovelace developed computer algorithms before computers existed, which makes her the world’s first computer programmer.
You further go on to rather “elegantly” state that who and what I am is entirely a product of mens’ cocks.
You place yourself in the lofty position of enlightened mentor to my childish and naive assumptions about men, sex, and more importantly, myself and the entire world I live in.
I wonder, when does my choice to swallow a red or blue pill come in?
Your cited evidence to convince me of my apparent delusions are statements such as “you sleep in a bed that they purchased, and travel and live at their expense”.
Let’s assume for a moment that you know exactly how I make and manage all my income, and what I have is all purchased at the expense of men.
I say: so what? But adding further on to this, I’ll now touch upon the reality: the bed I sleep in was paid for by me, if you must know.
The house I live in is paid for by me too, as are many of my possessions.
Those things that I do receive from men are a direct result of my efforts, intellect, imagination, will, and desire, not to mention their hard-earned money and obsequious attention.
I think it’s fair to say you don’t have much of a point thus far, if you care to read between the lines.
You further go on in inviting me to express my dominance with my males outside of the male imagination, without “using their desires against them”.
Why? Is not taking male intellect and imagination, desire and instinct into account when dominating them the supposed high road?
If so, I have quite a few lifestyle friends from “both sides of the whip”, as they say, who would take issue with that idea, and they aren’t victims of pro-male propaganda.
And, perhaps the jewel of all your statements: “Only then will you be doing what you do for you and not to upkeep a fantasy world for lowly perverted males.
Otherwise you will only be dealing in the realm of pleasing them, directly or indirectly.”
I find your outlook on the company I keep fairly insulting and tremendously misinformed—and that’s putting it nicely.
Who is this person who speaks to me as if she/he has the authority and worldliness to dictate when or how or why my dominance with my males is real or not?
Further, I find this need to discard male pleasure as a prerequisite of “real” Female dominance a foolish and unrealistic (and not to mention inhuman) notion.
Per your obviously polarized and distorted outlook on Female dominance and male submission, you are in no position to lecture to me on what it is that I do and enjoy.
I’m going to let you in on a little secret: Female dominance is real.
It doesn’t matter that men in our lives are also getting what they want.
We Women are getting what we want three-fold over, and the only limits inhibiting a Woman’s power or the horizons to which She can take Herself are her own cynicism and lack of imagination.
Just because we may use our sexuality to turn heads, gain admirers, clients, lovers and slaves doesn’t make us victims. This is a new age, and new battle lines in the war of the sexes are being drawn in many parts of the world. In fact, they are being moved, broken and ultimately blurred.
As the dust settles with each new renovation, things are looking pretty good for Women. Things aren’t looking much like a war at all, in fact. While there is still much to be done for the betterment of Women, it’s important to keep in mind the virtues of a modern western society, if you are so inclined to live in one.
As for you personally, I’m sorry you live in such a pessimistic and paranoid world that you believe there is a phantom phallus lodged permanently in all Women’s actions and motives. It must be awful really believing that.
P.s. For the record:
1. A family, society, community or state governed by Women.
2. A form of social organization in which the Mother is head of the family, and in which descent is reckoned in the Female line.
Source: Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary (I can quote Oxford too, if you like).
Lest there be any doubt, it’s both definitions I include when I speak of matriarchy. You’re free to insist definition two is the only relevant item, but it doesn’t mean we have to listen to you.
There are slaves. And there are subs (pets).
The servant is not a pet and does not wish to become one.
It is the sub who is a pet. He gains entrance in the Keeper’s realm as a pet. He wants to be dommed, but as a good doggy. He’s always trading his submission and devotion for something in return. He wants to gain affection, recognition, and to slowly conquer space and importance. As a pet, he develops an affection relationship and gets ever more demanding and jealous.
That said, the servant humbly accepts to be kept low to the ground. Instinctively, even though servitude is hard and oppressive -and it is!- he welcomes it because it keeps him at his right place. If he were allowed to gain too much attention and care he might become a pet, and his servantry would dilute and fade imperceptibly. He would eventually get lost in the growing schism between his servantry and the affectionate and possessive relationship that would develop with his Keeper.
That’s why I usually prefer to compare the servant to a horse and not a dog. A horse loves his Keeper. He loves when She murmurs words to his ear. He loves when She pats him possessively. He is happy and welcomes Her when She comes to use him and mount him. But he humbly accepts to be led back to his stable. He doesn’t want to get into the house, to leap on a sofa and make it his reserved territory and not let anyone sit on it. He doesn’t howl and bark for hours because His Keeper has left him for the day. He doesn’t always whine for more attention. He is not always jealous.
The horse will always be a humble servant. The dog will always be a demanding sub, eternally trying to top from the bottom.
I don’t mean that to imply that a special attitude is expected from the Keeper. It’s not that there is a recipe which the servant must be whipped and degraded on a set pattern. It all subtly depends on who the Keeper is. A Keeper can use a servant for whatever She needs him—even to have dinner, make love to him, or go to sleep in his arms when She feels like it. It’s something in Her attitude that will always let the servant know that whatever She might be demanding of him, his place will always remain in the stable. And, he will never hold property on the couch in the living room or on Her bed, lol.
There’s the same difference between subby players and servants as there is between Women who were born Keepers, and others who want to play at dominating, simply seeking fun in a game that could evolve into a vanilla relationship. The born Keeper might fancy treating a servant like a lover or go out with him as She would with a friend but there will be this certain something in Her that will leave no room for ambiguity. She will always be the Keeper and he the servant. Whatever She does, there will be no doubt She is using Her servant because of Her own whim of the moment, knowing the servant will have to bend and adapt to it. Conversely, the player Domme will remain in a complacent relationship based on trading, and she will be concerned with Her hubby-sub’s expectations.
How many of you have grand and/or great-grand parents? Or, how many of you have neighbors who are elderly and live alone? Did you know that the elderly suffer from social loneliness and isolation, and according to the AARP, the numbers are increasing. It’s easy to forget that elderly persons’ lives are very much static and stationary. They’re not going shopping, to the park and beach, nor are they having dinner with friends, traveling or seeing shows. Any many rarely have enough family members who visit them regularly. Have you ever stopped to consider what it’s like to not see anyone for days? Event the most reclusive, proud-to-be-a-loner person would miss seeing another human’s face after some time.
Loneliness is bad for our health in the same way that stress is. If you know an elderly person who lives alone, consider paying them a visit— a real visit, spending a few hours with them. Short, quick-stop visits (think of visiting nurses) do not count toward anything meaningful. Studies have been done that found a link between loneliness and inflammation, Altermizers, stroke, and insomnia.
Ways to help the elderly in your life or community:
Make transportation available, promote a sense of purpose, give a senior something to take care of, help them with adaptive technologies, visit and talk to neighbors and connect them with a local church or synagogue. See more here https://www.aplaceformom.com/blog/help-seniors-avoid-social-isolation-8-14-2014/
“Muddy water is best cleared by leaving it alone.” – Alan Watts.
How do you get out of depression?
How do you get out of your own mind?
How do you stop the mental chatter?
You don’t spend enough feeling.
The mind is on over-drive.
Thoughts are creating anxiety.
What do you do with this feeling of emptiness?
A note inside, to My some of My callers…
What a beautiful thing. Reminds you how much you love people. It’s impossible not to feel happy for them! Also shows you how humans are alike in many ways. :p I hope you enjoy!
“Chemical Surgery Can Correct Genetic Mutations Behind Many Diseases”
Check out this recent article posted in The Guardian. It reveals that through clever use of the CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology (CRISPR-Cas9 is a sort of new technology that enables “tailor made” DNA cutting sites) the team developed a catalytically impaired CRSIPR-Cas9 system (i.e., it won’t cut both strands of DNA) so that the team could just nick the DNA (“cut” only one strand of DNA). They also coupled a deaminase enzyme (an enzyme that removes an amino group) to the editing system (above) to convert adenine into inosine (that essentially changes one of the letter codes in DNA to another letter). This allows the cell DNA repair mechanisms to come in to correct this with the end result being conversion of what was an A-T base pair into a G-C base pair (This change in base pairs “repairs” the point mutation and thus mitigates the “disease”). This advancement opens up and lays the foundation for the treatment of diseases that are the result of single point mutations. That being said, there still lies a lot of work ahead to bring this amazing development into a practical reality.
Bottom Line: This clever use of new DNA editing technology has great potential in alleviating suffering from many diseases. 🙂
I’m going to be writing a blog about an ending conversation I had with a former slave of Mine. It’s a personal matter relating to his struggles with living life as a cross dresser while trying to manage his interpersonal relationships. Having a number of failed relationships with Women unable/unwilling to find comfort and compatibility with cross dressers, he remained alone for a great number of years – too many years. It’s a lonely life for some CD’s particularly when the internal urges for cross dressing are so strong they get in the way of finding an intimate partner to share life.
I may post it to the inside of My site as it’s very personal.
If there are any cross dressing members of Mine looking for an Owner, give Me a call to discuss. You don’t have to be featured on the site if you are private. My former sissy slave was private as well. That said, you do have to be on the older side; I find older men more in touch with themselves. Older than 35.
BDSM play is fun and it doesn’t matter if you submit only sexually— so long as you’re honest about it.
Entering into consensual slavery is different from engaging in BDSM play.
There are plenty of people who engage in sexy role-play and creative bedroom games.
My contention is the lack of self-awareness displayed by some who decide to enter into consensual slavery.
“Those” meaning persons who pretend to be something they’re really not.
That said, this is different from a newbie who is sure to make unintentional mistakes.
(More inside and video regarding this issue to follow.)
I have about 10 Female members registered to My site. One of them called Me on niteflirt. She and I hit it off so well, we’ve been talking to one another weekly. We may meet up on New Year’s Eve in Amsterdam. Anyway, She asked if I would tell Her what sorts of sensual rewards I can recommend She do with Her husband. They do not practice a BDSM lifestyle but She is dominant in the bedroom. I will make a video this weekend on one of the rewards I give My slaves for their good behavior. It’s sexy and erotic, and can be enjoyed by vanilla couples who want to dabble in bondage, teasing and sensation play. Stay tuned! 🙂